Skip to content

2

A version of this post first appeared in 2015.


Props to my stylist, Stephanie, aka The Miracle Worker

Spring is in the air here in South Carolina, a time of great anticipation and migration. The coots and geese are impressive, but they can't compete with the flocks of women gathering at their favorite beauty salons, lining up for the new spring 'do. I should know - I was one of them.

I had vowed to grow my hair out so that I could have a different look for my daughter's wedding, and was ever so close to having a chin-length bob. But I couldn't take it anymore. It was taking longer and longer to style my hair. My cowlicks kept subverting my efforts at Veronica Lake-style bangs. That side part was heaven-on-scalp for my gray roots. Finally, I succumbed to the siren call of the local salon and joined my fellow females for our annual Spring Makeover.

I have the type of hair that the best that can be said about it is that it's better than no hair at all. It's naturally very dark (or it was in my youth), which translates to 'high maintenance' once the Battle of the Gray commences. There's plenty of it, for now, but it's very fine. Last but not least, it's straight as a board.

When I was a teenager, long hair was in fashion. I'm talking down-to-the-waist long. This was also the era before blow dryers were commonplace, so washing and drying it was a headache. I dolled it up with sponge rollers on occasion; just the last few inches, to give it a little curl. Sometimes I used socks. Yes, socks. You place the hair in the middle of the sock, roll it up a few rotations, and tie the sock in a knot. This way you can put all the hair in a single sock rather than scores of little pink sponge rollers, which was faster, easier, and way more comfortable to sleep in. Yes, we slept in them overnight before the miracle of electric curlers arrived. But I digress.

In high school I girded my loins and cut my hair to shoulder length, which was big drama for me but what a relief, cutting both my hair and my grooming time in half. As time passed, I experimented with shorter and shorter styles. By the time I became a mom, there were plenty of men whose hair was longer than mine. And I loved it. Five minutes max, a little dryer, a little product, and you're out the door looking way better than those styles I spent ten times longer on. I must add I was living in Texas at the time. Short hair has an added bonus there in the summer months.

As much as I like the short styles, I have to admit they are not universally popular. I was shopping with my mom and her sister once. We all had short hairstyles at the time. The owner of the shop we were in was Middle Eastern. We were chatting, so he learned we were all related (as if he couldn't already tell by three 5'-9" women who came in together). When he felt comfortable, he asked us, 'why?' We said, 'why what?' and he said 'why do you wear your hair so short?' I guess he thought it was a family tradition, or a punishment of some kind. He may have been more used to women with long, thick, gorgeous Princess Jasmine hair. Princesses Jasmine, we were not. We stared blankly back at him and responded, 'why not?'

My biggest pet peeve about having short hair is how often I am called 'sir'. Granted, I am tall, as I mentioned earlier. I am not exactly svelte. But I never leave the house without earrings, mascara, lipstick, and the most essential grooming ingredient: eyebrows. I have a pretty respectable set of very obviously female equipment, if you get my meaning. My voice is not particularly deep. I no longer own a pair of overalls. Nevertheless, I wish I had a free partial foil for every time I have been called 'sir'.

I am sure there are also plenty of folks who assume I am a lesbian because I am the furthest thing from a girly-girl, have an active lifestyle, enjoy DIY projects around the house, and wear my hair short (never mind that I have been in a relationship with the same man for more than 30 years and have two grown children with him). I have no problem being mistaken for a lesbian. There are some exceedingly stylish lesbians out there. But mistaken for a man?? Sheesh!! Not the same thing at all!


80s era home perms. Do you begin to see why I wear my hair short now?

The first time it happened, I can't say I didn't have it coming. Strike one: I was living in Minnesota. Minnesota is a beautiful place full of friendly people, but it's not exactly a Vogue subscription hotbed. Strike two: I was at a home improvement store - stereotype alert!! Strike three: I was dressed casually: jeans, comfy boots, plaid shirt layered over a turtleneck sweater. From a distance, I admit, I probably looked like a man. The cashier said, 'thank you, sir' when we finished our transaction. Then she actually looked at me. As I stared back at her, somewhat stunned, she apologized and we went on our merry way. Immediately I resolved not to leave the house again in masculine garb if at all possible. But I shouldn't have worried. It has happened several times since then, regardless of what I am wearing. Sometimes I feel the urge to punch these people in their unobservant noses. But that would just validate their assumption - way too manly!

I like my hair short. I'll be damned if I'll knuckle under to societal stereotypes and waste another year growing it out. I have better things to do with my time. If I'm mistaken for a man, so be it. It's an unfair fact of life that men's haircuts are way cheaper. Maybe the gender confusion will save me some money on my next haircut.

Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, I hope you'll take a minute to subscribe to my blog (the subscribe box is near the top of the right sidebar).

2

The offending item
original photo here

Bemused by the big stink over a certain back-to-school offering (see photo) at a shop I haven't stepped foot into in more than 25 years (and rarely did even when my kids were small). Many knickers are in a twist over the last item listed on the shirt, Math. The argument goes like this: because the 'math' box is unchecked, it implies the (probably female) wearer doesn't like/isn't good at math, which fuels a sexist cliche that females are less intelligent.

My two cents on the Math question: yes, it is stupid and offensive, but let's be honest - what percentage of the population does like/is good at math, regardless of gender? Walk down any street in this country - heck, in the world! - asking everyone if they like/are good at math, and I bet you a gently-used 1990s era Texas Instruments multi-function calculator complete with original paperback instruction manual larger and heavier than said calculator, that at least 70% of the responses will be negative. (See what I did there?)

Also, it must be asked that on the topic of gender and intelligence, what is the ratio of males to females in the management hierarchy of said clothing store company responsible for giving the go-ahead to sell this shirt? Just askin'.

Anywho - math, schmath. Math is one of those necessary evils like kale or pap smears -  you know it is good for you, but it's dang hard to work up any enthusiasm for it. More interesting to me are the other three items on the list on that shirt: shopping, music, and dancing. Why aren't more people enraged by that list? Isn't the inclusion of those three cliche-ridden fluff hobbies more offensive than the unchecked Math?

I know all of you dance and band mommies are about to climb all over me for that. Yes, dancers are highly skilled athletes. Yes, it takes years of dedication to become a professional musician. But we all know playing at Carnegie Hall or dancing with the Bolshoi is not what the shirt maker had in mind. You are lumped in with shopping, for crying out loud!

(nervously looking over my shoulder, wondering if there is such a thing as Shopping Mommies)

If this store really wanted to impress me, here are a few other combinations that would be more palatable on a 'My Best Subjects' shirt.

Checked: Bioengineering     Quantum Physics      Economics

Unchecked: Housework

or

Checked: Tolerance      Inclusion      Equality 

Unchecked: Misogyny

or (my personal fave)

Under where it says 'My Best Subjects', only one box is checked off, and that box says 'ALL OF THEM'.

Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, I hope you'll take a minute and subscribe to my email list.

4

A funny thing happened on the way home from lunch recently. We stopped into a pizza joint for said lunch and notice a new deli in the space next door. After enjoying a pretty decent veggie pizza (thin crust, natch) we dropped into the deli to give it the once-over. On our way out, a gentleman from the deli chased us into the parking lot. Nothing unusual, he just wanted to make sure everything was okay since we left without ordering. We explained, he encouraged us to come back some time, end of story. Except while he was talking to my husband I could not help but notice his barn door was wide open.


Obvious, isn't it? Photo from bluestemprairie

Awkward, yes! Where do I look, now that I know this and am trying desperately not to look down there again???? He must have been in quite a hurry to follow us out to our cars. Was he in the gents, or had he been wandering around like that all morning and no one had the courtesy to clue him in? I will never know. But this incident got me thinking about fastening our clothing, specifically our pants, and how we got where we are today.

Things were so much easier when homo sapiens was busy learning to stand upright and dispensed with clothing altogether. Eventually someone decided a loincloth was in order. That's fine, but how to keep the thing on with all that running for your life? Rawhide to the rescue! A simple string tied around the waist did the trick.

'Twas not exactly a direct route from loin cloths to Levi's. The ancients of the Western world could not be bothered with the string and abandoned the loincloth idea entirely in favor of tunics, which, yes, might look a lot like a dress to us moderns. But tunics did little for warming the legs in cold climates, so pants eventually but grudgingly made a resurgence during the Middle Ages. The toga-and-tunic crowd considered them gauche. But their practicality and warmth could not be denied. Eventually some variation of pants made their way into non-pants societies in the form of tights, then knickers - form-fitting pants ending at the knee, with stockings covering the gap from the knee to the foot. Drawstrings and buttons served for fasteners.


Maybe it looks like a dress, but I'm not gonna mention to any of these dudes. Photo credit: Straight 2 DVD

Modern trousers finally triumphed during the French Revolution, worn by many to thumb their noses at the knickers-wearing aristocracy. Moving away from the drawstring style, pants next had front flap with some type of closing device, usually buttons, on either side. By the early 1900s the center front closure (still buttons!) and looser fit we are familiar with today became the norm.


Front flap precursor to center closure. Try not to stare. photo source fanpop

If you have ever owned a pair of button fly pants, join me in being ever so thankful to Gideon Sundbeck and others for inventing the modern zipper. Button fly may look cool and retro, but try feeling fashionable when you are also feeling the pressure to get them undone in a timely manner! Buttons, drawstrings, sashes, snaps, hooks, suspenders, and elastic have all had a go at keeping our pants up or closed or both. Zipper definitely dominates. Ironically it is both most convenient and also mostly likely to fail, as in the case of Deli Guy. Though I am appreciative of the zipper's elegant simplicity, I don't quite trust it. It never hurts to give the occasional XYZ*. Don't be that Deli Guy.

*eXamine Your Zipper

Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, I hope you'll take a minute to subscribe to my blog (the subscribe box is near the top of the right sidebar).